← Board · Eastwood — prices, sales, schools, crime

7 Rutledge Street, Eastwood

Strata plan SP91655 · 104 lots (NSW Strata Hub) · registered 2018-06-06 (age floor) · VG property id 4126364

This building has 32 recorded sales since 2021; 1 of its 104 lots are for sale right now. Every figure below is a government record with its source named — and the last section lists what the public record cannot tell you.

7 Rutledge St, Eastwood 2122 is a 104-lot strata building with 32 recorded sales since 2021, including 24 in the last 3 years. Weekly rents in the postcode range from $458–$600 for studios (median $518), $530–$700 for 1-bedroom units (median $600), $620–$778 for 2-bedroom units (median $678), and $800–$1000 for 3-bedroom units (median $850).

Written by AI from the government records on this page — checked figure-by-figure against them (2026-08-28). A description of the record, never advice.

On the market now

107/7 Rutledge Street, Eastwood NSW 2122 2 bed $828,000 119d on market

Every sale in this building

32 priced transfers on the public record since 2021.

In the last three years, 24 lots changed hands — 23% of the scheme's 104 lots. Trailing 36 months of VG transfers ÷ registered lot count.

Unit 803$810k2026-07-16

Unit 105$892k2026-03-19

Unit 505$880k2026-02-27

Unit 103$870k2026-02-09

Unit 110$800k2026-01-22

Unit 908$740k2025-11-05

NSW Valuer General bulk property sales information (CC-BY), every lot sharing this building's property id; unit labels are the register's own strings. Transfers under 3 months apart are excluded as double entries; growth figures are gross price movements, not returns.

What units here actually rent for

2-bed$620–$778/wkmedian $67878 bonds, Q2 2026

Real transacted rents — every residential bond lodged in postcode 2122 (NSW Fair Trading, CC-BY). Postcode is the finest geography the source publishes; the middle half (25th–75th percentile) is shown because identical floor plans in one building can lease hundreds apart.

Photo-read condition

1 of the building's photographed live listings read as: renovated. Read by AI from each listing's own marketing photos — a photo signal, not an inspection; cameras see nothing of plumbing, wiring, waterproofing or the strata record.

Nearby buildings with dossiers

9 Second Ave29 sales · 31 lots

181 Shaftsbury Rd24 sales · 22 lots

78 Mobbs Lane23 sales · 33% of resales above purchase

8 Avondale Way59 sales · 51 lots · 100% of resales above purchase

1 Glen St43 sales · 86 lots

What this dossier cannot tell you

Stated so a gap never reads as a clean bill (rule 7's positive form — silence is not evidence):

The strata books. Levies, the capital-works (sinking) fund, insurance, AGM minutes, and any defect claims in progress are not public records. Only a strata report — a paid inspection of the owners corporation's own books — has them. If you are serious about a unit here, buy that report; nothing on this page substitutes for it.
When the building was actually completed. The 2018 registration date is a floor — the scheme existed by then. Occupation certificates aren't in our sources; a conveyancer can obtain them.
Bedrooms on sales records. The Valuer General publishes no bedroom counts, so the sales above are every configuration pooled — a $732k sale and a $1.38M sale may be different-sized homes, not a price swing.
This building's own rents. Bond data is postcode-grain — the ranges above are the area's real transactions, not this building's ledger.
Anything behind the photos. Condition reads come from marketing photos and are unvalidated against outcomes — they see no plumbing, wiring, waterproofing, or the strata record.
Why any individual vendor is selling. The patterns above are the building's record; no line on this page is a claim about a particular home or owner.

© State of New South Wales (Spatial Services, a business unit of the Department of Customer Service NSW). For current information go to spatial.nsw.gov.au. VG figures: NSW Valuer General bulk property sales information (CC-BY). Every fact above names its source; where a source doesn't cover this building, the section doesn't appear.