The listing we observed
3 bedrooms · Townhouse
Listing details describe the advertised home. They do not verify its condition or approved use.
Sally Rodgers · last observed date unavailable← swipe · 10 photos
Last seen listed — $2,550,000 · our last sighting is undated
3 bed · 2 bath · 1 car · Townhouse
We haven't been able to re-confirm this listing since 1 Jan 1970 — it may have sold or been withdrawn since; the price shown is the last one advertised.
Your buyer evidence guide
Understand the home before the offer.
The useful records, what they mean, and the questions they leave open. Start here, then explore the evidence below.
How much price evidence fits
15 sales in the wider suburb/type pool
The wider pool is not a set of identical homes. Bedroom count, condition and location within the suburb affect comparability.
Published auction evidence · model trained through 2026-10-23Planning activity nearby
5 recorded applications at or near this address
An application is not an approval or a promise that building work will happen. Location and stage matter.
NSW Planning Portal · individual records in Explore the areaWhat deserves a closer look
- asking $2.55M
- listed by the agency (portal date)
These are recorded events, not evidence of the seller's motivation.
What we still cannot tell you
- No settled-sale history is available in this page's records. This does not mean the home has never sold.
- Direct price support is limited. Read the comparable sales and the estimate's uncertainty together.
- Public records and an automated estimate cannot establish whether the home is defect-free, what the contract contains, or why the owner is selling.
Questions to take to the inspection
Use these with the agent and your independent advisers. An answer is something to verify, not a fact we have recorded.
- Which nearby applications affect this home, and what stage has each actually reached?
- Which recent sales are most comparable to this home, and how do their size, condition and position differ?
- What repairs, alterations or water issues are documented, and what can an independent inspection verify?
- Do the planning and heritage records match this exact lot, and what approvals exist for alterations?
The estimate is a model output. The records are evidence. Your inspection and document checks fill the gaps.
Is the asking price plausible?
This is a comparison with the evidence we hold, not a valuation or a recommended offer.
CONSERVATIVE
$2.15M
the calibrated floor
LIKELY FAIR RANGE
$2.15M–$2.69M
around $2.4M mid
STRETCH CAP
$2.69M
$3.13M on the wider 80% band
Confidence: Low — based on 15 comparable auction sales · model runs ±11% for this configuration · the model's typical miss is ~11% against published results — every hit and miss
How this estimate was made
- Method: AI PropertyEye tree model · trained through 2026-10-23
- Inputs used for this home: no per-address records were available; this uses location and configuration only
- Comparable support: 15 sales in the wider suburb/type pool
- When to be more cautious: Condition, aspect, renovation and the contract are not model inputs and can move the eventual sale price.
Suburb risk flags
crime index: 21 — below sydney average · 24 min walk to Mosman Bay Wharf · ~18 min ferry to the CBD · ferries ~every 15 min at peak
Where every number comes from
- Fair value: AI PropertyEye tree model 2026-09-02-v7-price-model-v6-full-grid, trained through 2026-10-23 — trained on 172,805 published auction sales; priced per address where this home's own records reach the model (see "How this estimate was made"), otherwise at configuration level (suburb × type × beds), not an appraisal of this exact home
- Evidence trail: tracked by our radar from portal listings, web-archive checks and published auction results — each entry dated
- Risk flags: suburb-level overlays (BOCSAR crime, flood/bushfire intel, aircraft bands, GTFS transit) — NOT a per-parcel assessment
What changed recently?
- 9 July 2026 listed by the agency (portal date)
- 19 Aug 2026 asking $2.55M
- 4 Nov 2026 on market 118 days — portal listing date
What to inspect before you offer
- Condition, aspect, renovation and the contract — these can materially change price, and the estimate cannot see them.
- 5 development applications are recorded at or near this address — check the source records and current status.
- Planning controls and heritage status — confirm the exact lot, not just the address-level guide, before relying on development potential.
These are due-diligence prompts, not a verdict on this property.
Days on market — this campaign
118 days since our daily sweep first saw this listing.
The portal's own campaign may have started slightly earlier than our first sighting. Longer campaigns tend to mean more negotiating room — the board's "Longest listed" sort exists for exactly that reason.
Rent evidence — asking vs transacted, Cremorne · postcode 2090
$1165–$1550/wk is what 3-bed townhouses in 2090 actually transact for (middle half of 28 bonds lodged, last 12 mo · median $1350/wk — NSW Fair Trading, CC BY).
2019Q1 → 2026Q2: $972 → $1500/wk · +4% over the last 12 months (latest four quarters averaged against the previous four) — quarterly new-tenancy medians for townhouses in 2090, all bedroom counts pooled.
Asking rents are what agents hope for; bond figures are what tenants actually signed at (NSW Fair Trading bond lodgements, CC BY). No yield % is derived here: each rent above is a different grain from this home's price, and a ratio of two grains reads as precision it doesn't have. New-tenancy rents run hotter than sitting rents. Not financial advice.
Development potential — how North Sydney Council treats the work you might do
Refuses 5.6% of the development applications it decides · off-street parking 16.28% (determinations to Nov 2023).
The full outlook — every category with confidence ranges, which plan elements come unstuck, and the heritage effect by category — is under Explore the area.
Agencies' own published sales nearby — Cremorne, around 3 beds
| Address | Sold | Price | Beds | Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34/15-23 Sutherland Street | 19 Oct 2026 | $1,700,000 | 2 | Cunninghams |
| 36/15-23 Sutherland Street | 19 Oct 2026 | $1,500,000 | 2 | Cunninghams |
Prices as published on the selling agency's own website (their sold pages) — includes private-treaty sales the auction results never see. Only sales the agency chose to publish a figure for appear here.
Similar properties — on the market now
The one listing above are on the market now: same townhouse category, within 1 bedroom of 3, asking within 20% of this one, in Cremorne or a suburb whose centre is within 3 km — ordered by how close the asking price is. That is the whole rule: a filter, not a recommendation, and nothing here judges which home is better.
Planning & zoning — R3 Medium Density Residential
Townhouses, villas and low-rise units permitted — expect gradual medium-density infill.
Zone R3 (Medium Density Residential) under the NORTH SYDNEY LEP, from the NSW ePlanning layers at this address's geocoded point — a guide, not a parcel-level legal check. Confirm the exact lot at the NSW Planning Portal.
Development outlook — how often North Sydney Council has refused this kind of work
| If you wanted to… | Refused | vs NSW | Applications decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alterations & additions | 2.27% (1.11–4.62%) | 0.9× (NSW 2.63%) | 7 refused of 308 · 18 approved with conditions |
| Off-street parking | 16.28% (8.12–29.97%) | 6.3× (NSW 2.58%) | 7 refused of 43 · 2 approved with conditions |
| Pool, deck or fence | 6.15% (2.42–14.78%) | 3.6× (NSW 1.73%) | 4 refused of 65 · 3 approved with conditions |
| Granny flat | too few to rate | — (NSW 4.45%) | 1 refused of 2 |
| Knock down & rebuild | 8.11% (2.8–21.3%) | 0.7× (NSW 11.55%) | 3 refused of 37 · 3 approved with conditions |
Across all application types North Sydney Council refused 5.6% (3.95–7.88%) of the 536 development applications it decided.
Where these applications come unstuck
The refusal rate above says how strict the council is. This says which part of a plan is exposed — measured across all 192,284 NSW development applications, not just this council. Each is an association: plenty of applications carrying these elements are approved, and nothing here is a verdict on a proposal you haven't made yet.
- Alterations & additions — a new vehicle crossing cut into the front boundary (refused 7.27% vs 2.59% for this kind of work generally — 2.8×, on 220 applications); excavation or a new lower level (refused 6.71% vs 2.54% for this kind of work generally — 2.64×, on 611 applications)
- Off-street parking — a new vehicle crossing cut into the front boundary (refused 8.45% vs 2.42% for this kind of work generally — 3.49×, on 284 applications)
- Pool, deck or fence — excavation or a new lower level (refused 6.22% vs 1.61% for this kind of work generally — 3.88×, on 659 applications); full demolition and rebuild (refused 4.97% vs 1.6% for this kind of work generally — 3.12×, on 965 applications)
- Knock down & rebuild — excavation or a new lower level (refused 25.78% vs 9.36% for this kind of work generally — 2.75×, on 256 applications); full demolition and rebuild (refused 19.91% vs 10.46% for this kind of work generally — 1.9×, on 221 applications)
Determinations lodged on the NSW Planning Portal up to Nov 2023 — the published dataset stops there, so this is a record of how the council has behaved, not a forecast and not a statement about any particular application. Rates cover development applications only; modifications and reviews of an earlier decision are excluded. A rate is shown only where at least 30 applications were decided — below that the counts are given instead, because a percentage from a handful of decisions is not a fact about a council. "Approved with conditions" is a consent, not a refusal, and is never counted as one.
Development applications — at & near this address
| Where | Proposal | Status | Outcome | Est. cost | Lodged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~98 m · 1a Belgrave Street Cremorne 2090 | Residential Flat Building, Alterations Or Additions To An Existing Building Or Structure, Residential Accommodation · 1 new dwelling | Determined | not on record | $880k | 2025-04-15 |
| ~123 m · 39 Young Street Cremorne 2090 | Alterations And Additions To Residential Development | Deferred Commencement | Approved, with conditions | $1.01M | 2020-06-23 |
| ~133 m · 216 Ben Boyd Road Cremorne 2090 | Dwelling House, Alterations Or Additions To An Existing Building Or Structure · 1 new dwelling | Withdrawn | not on record | $1.01M | 2026-06-18 |
| ~133 m · 216 Ben Boyd Road Cremorne 2090 | Dwelling House, Alterations Or Additions To An Existing Building Or Structure | Pending Lodgement | not on record | $968k | 2026-11-02 |
| ~139 m · 51 Sutherland Street Cremorne 2090 | Alterations And Additions To Residential Development · 1 new dwelling | Determined | Approved | $442k | 2020-11-23 |
Development application data © NSW Department of Planning and Environment, used under CC BY 4.0. Matched at this exact address or within ~150 m of its geocoded point — proximity evidence, not a parcel-level check. Lodged means proposed, not approved or built. Outcome comes from a separate NSW dataset that stops in Nov 2023: applications determined after that, or still undetermined, read “not on record” — which means we don't know, never that it was refused. “Status” is the council's own workflow state and “Determined” on its own does not say which way it went. Verify any application on the NSW Planning Portal.
What's changing in Cremorne — recent local signals
2026-09-21 — Development site — listing's own words: "STCA" (6 Reynolds Street, Cremorne, NSW 2090) (listing rea-152305020 (rea), first seen 2026-09-21)
2026-08-24 — Development site — listing's own words: "STCA" (34 Brightmore Street, Cremorne, NSW 2090) (listing rea-152127548 (rea), first seen 2026-08-24)
2026-08-17 — Development site — listing's own words: "Development Opportunity" (58 Waters Road, Cremorne, NSW 2090) (listing rea-151001668 (rea), first seen 2026-08-17)
Dated public signals compiled for this suburb — openings, closures, site sales and institutional moves. Facts with sources, not forecasts.
School catchments
Middle Harbour PS (primary) · Mosman HS (secondary)
6 primary schools within 2 km · ICSEA ~1155 — the socio-educational advantage of the school community (My School, national average ~1000): a demographic measure, never a results or quality score.
NSW DoE intake zones at this address's geocoded point — tighter than a suburb-level guess, but geocodes carry a few metres of error and boundaries change with reviews. Verify the exact address at School Finder. Intake zones cover government schools only.
Green space nearby
Protected public recreation land within 250 m
Land zoned RE1 under the local environmental plan — reserved for public recreation, which protects it from being built over. The zoning doesn't say what's on it or how usable it is, and this layer doesn't carry park names.
Privately-zoned recreation land (RE2 — typically golf courses or club grounds) within 1000 m. Private land: green outlook, not public open space.
Straight-line distance, not walking distance. NSW ePlanning planning layers (Land Zoning), CC BY. Distances are ladder buckets measured at the address's geocoded point.
Want the numbers agents don't volunteer?
Check any Sydney suburb free — Market Mint market-conditions readout, live median, clearance trend and the price model — at aipropertyeye.com. No sign-up for the suburb check; the full board is 7 days free.
Data from published auction results (Domain) and live portal listings. Estimates are never valuations or financial advice. Own this home and want a result corrected? hello@aipropertyeye.com.